[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610111316120.26779@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:16:56 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
cc: torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
>diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>index ddc0681..b30372f 100644
>--- a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
>@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int __init ts102_uctrl_init(void)
> }
>
> driver->regs->uctrl_intr = UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_REQ|UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_MSK;
>- printk("uctrl: 0x%x (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq);
>+ printk("uctrl: 0x%p (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq);
So what's the difference, except that %p will evaluate to (nil) or
(null) when the argument is 0 [this is the case with glibc]?
That would print 0x(nil).
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists