[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160571491.3000.372.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:58:11 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Amol Lad <amol@...ismonetworks.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/mmc/mmc.c: Replacing yield() with a better
alternative
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 18:15 +0530, Amol Lad wrote:
> In 2.6, the semantics of calling yield() changed from "sleep for a
> bit" to "I really don't want to run for a while". This matches POSIX
> better, but there's a lot of drivers still using yield() when they mean
> cond_resched(), schedule() or even schedule_timeout().
>
> For this driver cond_resched() seems to be a better
> alternative
>
are you sure?
> Tested compile only
>
> Signed-off-by: Amol Lad <amol@...ismonetworks.com>
> ---
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/drivers/mmc/mmc.c linux-2.6.19-rc1/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/drivers/mmc/mmc.c 2006-10-05 14:00:46.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc1/drivers/mmc/mmc.c 2006-10-11 17:57:02.000000000 +0530
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static void mmc_deselect_cards(struct mm
> static inline void mmc_delay(unsigned int ms)
> {
> if (ms < HZ / 1000) {
> - yield();
> + cond_resched();
> mdelay(ms);
this probably wants msleep(), especially with hrtimers comming up; there
the sleeps are always exact...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists