linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/21]: powerpc/cell spidernet bugfixes, etc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610111802.43996.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:02:42 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Linas Vepstas <linas@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, jeff@...zik.org, James K Lewis <jklewis@...ibm.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21]: powerpc/cell spidernet bugfixes, etc.

On Tuesday 10 October 2006 22:49, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Andrew, please apply/forward upstream.
> 
> The following set of 21 patches (!) are all aimed at the the 
> spidernet ethernet device driver. The spidernet is an etherenet
> controller built into the Toshiba southbridge for the PowerPC Cell
> processor. (This is the only device in existance that with this
> ethernet hardware in it).
> 
> These patches re-package/re-order/re-cleanup a previous
> set of patches I've previously mailed. Thus, some have
> been previously Acked-by lines, most do not. Most of
> these patches are tiny, and handle problems that cropped
> up during testing. Sorry about there being so many of them.
> 
> The first set of 12 patches fix a large variety of mostly 
> minor bugs. 
> 
> The important patches are 13 through 17: these overcome a 
> debilitating performance problem on transmit (6 megabits
> per second !!) on transmit of patches 500 bytes or larger.
> After applying these, I am able to get the following:
> 
> pkt sz   speed (100K buffs)       speed (4M buffs)
> ------   -----------------        ----------------
> 1500     700 Mbits/sec            951 Mbits/sec
> 1000     658 Mbits/sec            770
> 800      600                      648
> 500      500                      500
> 300      372                      372
> 60        70                       70
> 
> Above buf size refers to /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default

Excellent work! I guess this the best tx performance we've
seen so far on this hardware.

Consider this as an Acked-by: for all the patches, I'll save
the effort of replying to each one of them separately.

Jeff, do you plan on merging these fixes for 2.6.19?

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/