[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452D4306.3040407@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:16:22 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
CC: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> %p will do no such thing in the kernel. As for the difference... %x
>>> might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
>>> *)==sizeof(int)),
>>> but it's not portable _and_ not right. %p is proper C for that...
>
> Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
> there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
That really makes gcc bitch, *and* it's wrong for a whole bunch of reasons.
>> It's really too bad gcc bitches about %#p, because that's arguably The Right
>> Thing.
>
> ack. Make a bug report perhaps?
Maybe. They'll probably say "the C standard says so" :-/
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists