[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061010.205049.132929620.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rdreier@...co.com
Cc: mst@...lanox.co.il, shemminger@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
openib-general@...nib.org, rolandd@...co.com
Subject: Re: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:49:09 -0700
> David> non-sendfile() paths will generate big packets just fine,
> David> as long as the application is providing that much data.
>
> OK, cool. Will the big packets be non-linear skbs?
If you had SG enabled (and thus checksumming offload too) then yes
you'll get a non-linear SKB. Otherwise, without SG, you'll get a
fully linear SKB.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists