linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: more workarounds for recent binutils idiocy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061011220726.GE29920@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:07:26 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: more workarounds for recent binutils idiocy

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > cretinous thing doesn't believe that (%a0)+ is one macro argument and
> > splits it in two; worked around by quoting the argument...
> 
> NAK, this is a bug in binutils and is fixed there already (at least in 
> CVS).

OK...  Would be nice to find out which versions are broken (that's
Documentation/Changes fodder), I'll see to it.

What about the first problem?  Even current binutils CVS treats
foo.bar as a single identifier, and doesn't recognize it as invocation
of foo with .bar as the first argument.  Any objections against the
first patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/