[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061011004654.GB25430@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:46:54 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SPAM: Re: [rfc] 2.6.19-rc1-git5: consolidation of file backed fault handlers
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:09:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > \ What: vm_ops.nopage
> > -When: October 2008, provided in-kernel callers have been converted
> > +When: October 2007, provided in-kernel callers have been converted
> > Why: This interface is replaced by vm_ops.fault, but it has been around
> > forever, is used by a lot of drivers, and doesn't cost much to
> > maintain.
>
> but a year is a really long time; 6 months would be a lot more
> reasonable..
> (it's not as if most external modules will switch until it's really
> gone.. more notice isn't really going to help that at all; at least make
> the kernel printk once on the first use of this so that they notice!)
I agree with that. But the printk can't go in until all the in-tree
users are converted. I will get around to doing that once the
interface is firmer.
As for timeframe, I don't have any strong feelings, but 6 months might
only be 1 kernel release, and we may not have got around to putting the
printk in yet ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists