[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610121017.52655.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:17:52 +0200
From: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@...h.u-psud.fr>
To: linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
gregkh@...e.de, Paolo Abeni <paolo.abeni@...il.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usbmon: add binary interface
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 22:43, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +0000, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> > interface if we allow resizing on text interface?
>
> I haven't reviewed Paolo's patch yet, but with that in mind:
> - No, text is not deprecated yet. That is only possible when a simplified
> command-line tool is written and distributed (e.g. usbmon(8)).
> - No, I do not think an ioctl in debugfs or a text API is a good idea.
> - Resizing on text interface magnifies sprintf contribution to CPU burn,
> so once we have the binary one, there's only disadvantage and
> no advantage in implementing that.
By the way, any reason why CONFIG_USB_MON doesn't select CONFIG_DEBUG_FS?
Is usbmon useful without debugfs?
Ciao,
Duncan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists