[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0610120130y5656e99fgf0bb9305d1467b6e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:30:59 +0200
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
To: "Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johninsd@....rr.com, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
trini@...nel.crashing.org, davem@...emloft.net, ecd@...inaid.de,
wli@...omorphy.com, rc@....org.uk, spyro@....com, rth@...ddle.net,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, matthew@....cx, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, uclinux-v850@....nec.co.jp,
chris@...kel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - sh
On 10/12/06, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> The sh bits look fine, though I'm fairly impartial to this change. It
> doesn't seem like this is going to be needed in very many places..
Thank you for your quick response!
But I failed to push i386 command-line size to more than 256 bytes...
You are right, it is required only for memory extreme devices...
Options:
1. Add COMMAND_LINE_SIZE to kernel config - was rejected because
kernel has already too much parameters, this was the initial patch
more than a year ago.
2. Just increase COMMAND_LINE_SIZE of i386, x86_64 - was rejected
because of it affecting low memory devices.
3. Convert the command-line into dynamically allocated buffers - this try.
> In the future, you may also wish to CC linux-arch if you want the
> attention of architecture maintainers.
Thank you, I was not aware of this.
I hope there will be no take 3 :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists