linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18 - check for chroot, broken root and cwd values in procfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:21:36 +0200
From:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To:	Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, md@...ux.it
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 - check for chroot, broken root and cwd values in procfs

Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org> writes:

> Is this a desired output or can I call this a bug? If the behaviour is
> correct, is there a replacement for this check?

[ "$(stat -c "%d/%i" /)" = "$(stat -Lc "%d/%i" /proc/1/root)" ]

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/