[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061012163522.GE20868@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:35:22 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 00/67] 2.6.18-stable review
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > And yes, we realize that this is a large number of patches, sorry...
>
> I number of these patches were cleanups, such as removing code betewen
> #if 0, removing header files from being exported, etc. Not bad
> things, but I wouldn't have thought it would have met the criteria for
> being added to -stable. Are you intentionally relaxing the criteria?
The header file stuff was intentionally added, as it is good to have the
header files exported properly. Those were a large number of these
patches.
If you have specific questions about any one patch, please let us know.
I didn't purposefully take any "cleanup" type patch that I know of, but
there was a lot here, so one might have slipped in...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists