linux-kernel - Re: Can context switches be faster?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1160684954.3000.473.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:29:14 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	John Richard Moser <nigelenki@...cast.net>
Cc:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can context switches be faster?

> ther uniprocessor machines.
> > 
> 
> That's a load more descriptive :D
> 
> 0.890 uS, 0.556uS/cycle, that's barely 2 cycles you know.  (Pentium M)
> PPC performs similarly, 1 cycle should be about 1uS.
> 
> > Chris

you have your units off; 1 cycle is 1 nS not 1 uS  (or 0.556 nS for the
pM)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/