[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061012142625.520d3d87.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:26:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, Don Mullis <dwm@...r.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] fault-injection capabilities (v5)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:43:05 +0900
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> Fault-injection capabilities patch set version 5.
It all looks quite nice, thanks. Couple of things...
You've presumably run a kernel with these various things enabled. What
happens? Does the kernel run really slowly? Does userspace collapse in a
heap? Does it oops and die?
Also, one place where this infrastructure could be of benefit is in device
drivers: simulate a bad sector on the disk, a pulled cable, a timeout
reading from a status register, etc. If that works well and is useful then
I can see us encouraging driver developers to wire up fault-injection in
the major drivers.
Hence it would be useful at some stage to go in and to actually do all this
for a particular driver. As an example implementation for others to
emulate and as a test for the fault-injection infrastructure itself - we
may discover that new capabilities are needed as this work is done.
I wouldn't say this is an urgent thing to be doing, but it is a logical
next step..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists