[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452EBF7C.3000409@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:19:40 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
CC: acpi-devel@...nel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60
I have a Thinkpad X60 with an Intel Core Duo T2400. In
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone, I'm getting two subdirectories, each with their
own set of files:
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/cooling_mode:
<setting not supported>
cooling mode: critical
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/polling_frequency:
<polling disabled>
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/state:
state: ok
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/temperature:
temperature: 53 C
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/trip_points:
critical (S5): 127 C
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/cooling_mode:
<setting not supported>
cooling mode: passive
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/polling_frequency:
<polling disabled>
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/state:
state: ok
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/temperature:
temperature: 53 C
/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/trip_points:
critical (S5): 97 C
passive: 93 C: tc1=5 tc2=4 tsp=600 devices=0xf7eaa264 0xf7eaa244
The interesting thing is that the two sets of files are not consistent -
sometimes they don't even show the same temperature.
The reason I'm interested in this is that I think it's behind some of my
cpufreq problems. Sometimes the kernel decides that I just can't raise
the max frequency above 1GHz, because its been thermally limited (I've
put printks in to confirm that its the ACPI thermal limit on the policy
notifier chain which is limiting the max speed). It seems to me that
having a thermal zone for each core is a BIOS bug, since they're really
the same chip, but the THM1 entries should be ignored. I don't believe
the CPU has ever approached either 97 C, let alone 127; while I put it
under a fair amount of load, it is sitting on a desktop with no airflow
obstructions, so if it really is overheating it suggests a serious
design problem with the hardware.
But I'm just speculating; I'm not really sure what all this means. Any
clues?
Thanks,
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists