[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <452DD058.7000301@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:19:20 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fdtable: Eradicate fdarray overflow.
Vadim Lobanov a écrit :
>
> diff -Npru old/fs/file.c new/fs/file.c
> --- old/fs/file.c 2006-10-10 18:58:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ new/fs/file.c 2006-10-11 19:37:23.000000000 -0700
> @@ -164,9 +164,8 @@ static struct fdtable * alloc_fdtable(un
> * the fdarray into page-sized chunks: starting at a quarter of a page,
> * and growing in powers of two from there on.
> */
> - nr++;
> nr /= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *));
> - nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr);
> + nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr + 1);
> nr *= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *));
> if (nr > NR_OPEN)
> nr = NR_OPEN;
Hi Vadim
I find your PAGE_SIZE/4 minimum allocation quite unjustified.
For architectures with 64K PAGE_SIZE, we endup allocating 16K, for poor tasks
that happen to touch a not so high (>= 64) file descriptor...
I would vote for a fixed size, like 1024
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists