[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610130229480.29022@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:39:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix parport_serial_pci_resume() ignoring return value
from pci_enable_device()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Russell King wrote:
> I suspect all these kind of patches are introducing additional problems.
> This one certainly is. Who's auditing all these patches? I mean _properly_
> auditing them rather than just saying "that's a good idea"?
For the fm801 gameport case it is fine - it's just one more check in the
_probe() function, performing the same error path as other cases do.
ALSA case has already been solved by calling snd_card_disconnect() on
error path.
But I agree that sk98lin and parport_serial_pci patches are likely broken.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists