[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061013150921.GB3513@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:09:21 -0500
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
phillip@...lewell.homeip.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: superblock cleanups
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:41:21AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> - Kill useless ecryptfs_set_superblock_private wrapper
> - Rename ecryptfs_superblock_to_private to ecryptfs_sb for readability
Okay, but if we are going to do this for the superblock info struct,
why not do it for all objects (file, dentry, and inode) in order to
maintain naming consistency? That would be a pretty large, yet
functionally trivial, patch. Is there a general interest in doing
this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists