linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: superblock cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061013150921.GB3513@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:09:21 -0500
From:	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	phillip@...lewell.homeip.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: superblock cleanups

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:41:21AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>   - Kill useless ecryptfs_set_superblock_private wrapper
>   - Rename ecryptfs_superblock_to_private to ecryptfs_sb for readability

Okay, but if we are going to do this for the superblock info struct,
why not do it for all objects (file, dentry, and inode) in order to
maintain naming consistency? That would be a pretty large, yet
functionally trivial, patch. Is there a general interest in doing
this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/