lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061013150921.GB3513@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:09:21 -0500
From:	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	phillip@...lewell.homeip.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: superblock cleanups

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:41:21AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>   - Kill useless ecryptfs_set_superblock_private wrapper
>   - Rename ecryptfs_superblock_to_private to ecryptfs_sb for readability

Okay, but if we are going to do this for the superblock info struct,
why not do it for all objects (file, dentry, and inode) in order to
maintain naming consistency? That would be a pretty large, yet
functionally trivial, patch. Is there a general interest in doing
this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ