[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061013120321.148ee494.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:03:21 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de,
Don Mullis <dwm@...r.net>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection
capabilities
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:00:39 +0900
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:20:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I read the documentation but I still don't understand this feature. What
> > does the stacktrace actually do? It gets stored somewhere and displayed
> > later? What's it all for?
>
> For example someone may want to inject kmalloc()/kmem_cache_alloc()
> failures into only e100 module. they want to inject not only direct
> kmalloc() call, but also indirect allocation, too.
>
> - e100_poll --> netif_receive_skb --> packet_rcv_spkt --> skb_clone
> --> kmem_cache_alloc
>
> This patch enables to detect function calls like this by stacktrace
> and inject failures. The script
> Documentaion/fault-injection/failmodule.sh
> helps it.
>
> The range of text section of loaded e100 is expected to be
> [/sys/module/e100/sections/.text, /sys/module/e100/sections/.exit.text)
>
> So failmodule.sh stores these values into /debug/failslab/address-start
> and /debug/failslab/address-end.
Oh I see. So you walk up the stack and if any caller falls between those
two addresses, we enable the fault-injector. Fair enough.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists