[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830610131647p5427b57aq6a6e91b860e093df@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:47:17 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Matt Helsley" <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Chandra Seetharaman" <sekharan@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
On 10/13/06, Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:51 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > BTW, it it not just CKRM/RG, Paul Menage as recently extracted the
> > > processes aggregation from cpuset to have an independent infrastructure
> > > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=116006307018720&w=2), which
> > > has its own file system. I was advocating him to use configfs. But, he
> > > also has this issue/limitation.
> >
> > That's one reason it is so easy to just write your own filesystem then.
> > What is it these days, less than 200 lines of code? I bet you can even
>
> For my_school_project_fs perhaps 200 lines is sufficient.
>
> Paul Menage's patch which Chandra was referring to:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/104
>
> is 1700 insertions.
To be fair, only about 350 lines of that is filesystem boilerplate.
There's also maybe 100-200 lines of interfacing with the filesystem,
but they'd probably be there as configfs-interfacing code if it was
over configfs.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists