[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061013075953.GC28654@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:59:53 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: handle pci_enable_device() failure upon resume
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:47:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
NAK. What happens to the ports if pci_enable_device() fails and someone
has them open?
It's far better to leave the must_check warning behind until it can be
_correctly_ solved, rather than papering over the problem with bogus
patches to return errors without taking an appropriate additional action.
IOW, the warnings serve as a reminder that *proper* error handling needs
to be implemented.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists