linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10 of 23] Unionfs: Inode operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020610130153q75e34eefg5858f9345e335063@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:53:09 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Josef Jeff Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, hch@...radead.org,
	viro@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10 of 23] Unionfs: Inode operations

On 10/7/06, Josef Jeff Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu> wrote:
> +static int unionfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *ia)
> +{

[snip]

> +       for (bindex = bstart; (bindex <= bend) || (bindex == bstart); bindex++) {

But everywhere else we have

>        for (bindex = bstart; bindex <= bend; bindex++) {

Hmm?

P.S. for_each_branch() and for_each_branch_reverse() might be a good idea.

                                       Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/