linux-kernel - Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061013105807.GB1690@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:58:07 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	David Johnson <dj@...id-web.co.uk>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:20:48AM +0100, David Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 09:56, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > I'd try with this:
> > - minimal workable config with a lot of debugging turned on (e.g. no:
> > smp, floppy, parport, mouse, ipv6, video, clock modulation, apm, acpi
> > buttons, thermal etc. - only base acpi or no if possible),
> > - 2.4 kernel,
> > - other distro e.g. live-cd knoppix,
> > - other transfer method like ftp (all superfluous services turned off).
> >
> 
> I'll give that a go and I guess I should also see whether I can reproduce it 
> under Windows too...

Sure! After all we shouldn't be system nazis and let others do
some secondary jobs...  

Regards,

Jarek P.

PS: I hope you tested it also under internal stress (heavy
copying plus computing). 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/