[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000401c6ee5d$727de3e0$db34030a@amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:20:52 -0700
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>
To: "'Dave Jones'" <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: "'Zach Brown'" <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"'Suparna Bhattacharya'" <suparna@...ibm.com>,
"Lahaise, Benjamin C" <benjamin.c.lahaise@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-aio" <linux-aio@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] rearrange kioctx and aio_ring_info
Dave Jones wrote on Thursday, October 12, 2006 5:04 PM
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:25:54PM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> > The following patch is result of our kernel data latency analysis on a
> > large database setup (128 logical CPU, 1 TB memory, a couple thousand
> > disks). The analysis is done at an individual cache line level through
> > hardware performance monitor unit. What we did essentially is to collect
> > data access latency on every kernel memory address and look for top 50
> > longest average access latency. The hardware performance unit also keeps
> > track of instruction address for each collected data access. This allows
> > us to further associate each of the top 50 cache lines to instruction
> > sequences that caused long latency.
>
> Do you have performance numbers of before/after this change ?
Not yet, I just queued up experiment on our internal benchmark setup. I posted
the patch here to get some early discussion on how to attack the problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists