linux-kernel - Re: sluggish system responsiveness under higher IO load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:39:57 +0200
From:	Matthias Dahl <mlkernel@...tal-soul.de>
To:	Paolo Ornati <ornati@...twebnet.it>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sluggish system responsiveness under higher IO load

On Friday 06 October 2006 17:58, Paolo Ornati wrote:

> I used to have this type of problem and 2.6.19-rc1 looks much better
> than 2.6.18.
>
> I'm using CONFIG_PREEMPT + CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL, CFQ i/o scheduler
> and /proc/sys/vm/swappiness = 20.

I will give 2.6.19 a test in a few weeks when the dust of all the changes have 
settled a bit. :-)

As my Mike Galbraith suggested, I made some tests with renicing the IO 
intensive applications. This indeed makes a hell of a difference. Currently I 
am renicing everything that causes a lot of disk IO to a nice of 19. Even 
though this doesn't fix it completely, the occasional short hangs have become 
less common.

Unfortunately things have gotten a bit worse again since I switched my machine 
over to a linux software RAID5 (3 sata disks attached to the nforce4 ultra) 
even though I hoped quite the opposite would happen.

Have a nice weekend,
matthew.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/