linux-kernel - Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061015122453.GA12549@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:24:54 +0100
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions

On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:14:58PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> As usual, we are swamped with bug reports for regressions after -rc1.
> 
> For an easier reading (and hoping linux-kernel might not eat the emails), 
> I've splitted the list of known regressions in three emails:
>   [1/3] known unfixed regressions
>   [2/3] knwon regressions with workarounds
>   [3/3] known regressions with patches

There's a raft of ARM regressions as well (see
http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.19-rc2/index.html), mostly
related to the IRQ changes, as well as this error:

sysctl_net.c:(.text+0x64a8c): undefined reference to `highest_possible_node_id'

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/