[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061015032000.GP11633@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:20:01 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Val Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:48:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:02:49 -0600
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:41:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Bisection shows that this patch
> > > (pci-check-that-mwi-bit-really-did-get-set.patch in Greg's PCI tree) breaks
> > > suspend-to-disk on my Vaio. It writes the suspend image and gets to the
> > > point where it's supposed to power down, but doesn't.
> >
> > How odd. What driver is calling pci_set_mwi() on the suspend path?
>
> ehci_pci_reinit(). I stuck a dump_stack() in there. See
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000342.jpg
Thanks for the picture; that's really helpful.
I see. We hibernate all the devices then wake them all back up again.
No doubt there's a good reason for this.
Still doesn't make much sense, though. As far as I can see, the only
consequence of this particular patch is that 1) we do an additional read
from PCI_COMMAND and 2) we can return -EINVAL in one additional case.
But the only effect of returning EINVAL is a printk (for this particular
driver):
/* PCI Memory-Write-Invalidate cycle support is optional (uncommon) */
retval = pci_set_mwi(pdev);
if (!retval)
ehci_dbg(ehci, "MWI active\n");
ehci_port_power(ehci, 0);
return 0;
So even if we return EINVAL ... big deal.
Is it possible reading PCI_COMMAND too quickly after writing it causes
a foul-up? That would be weird ...
so I suppose there's a few things I can ask you to try:
1. Stop reading the register back altogether. This should revert the behaviour to the prepatch state:
- pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
+// pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
2. Put an mdelay(1); before that line
3. Change the last line to just return 0.
- return (cmd & PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
> > What drivers do you have loaded on the Vaio?
>
> sony:/home/akpm> lsmod
I don't see any of the other drivers calling pci_set_mwi, so i guess we're
looking at the right suspect.
I feel rather guilty about the amount of time you're spending on this;
any bugs you want me to look at as penance?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists