[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160996295.24237.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:58:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, matthew@....cx,
val_henson@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
Ar Sul, 2006-10-15 am 18:10 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> Question is, should pci_set_mwi() ever return -EFOO? I guess it should, in
> the case where setting the line size didn't work out.
It does no harm, no driver will ever check anything but 0 v !0 because
the handling is no different in either case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists