| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <16554.129.240.220.12.1161003642.squirrel@peltkore.net> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:00:42 -0600 (MDT) From: vegard@...tkore.net To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <B.Zolnierkiewicz@...a.pw.edu.pl>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Paul Bristow" <paul@...lbristow.net>, "Gadi Oxman" <gadio@...vision.net.il> Subject: [PATCH] IDE: typedef struct clean-up From: Vegard Nossum <vegard@...tkore.net> Replaces typedefs with struct-constructs for large parts of the IDE API and drivers. No semantic changes. Rationale: CodingStyle, chapter 5. Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard@...tkore.net> --- Applies to Linus's 2.6 tree. I figured that this kind of easy/routine job would make for a gentle introduction to kernel programming. However, what is the general opinion of this kind of work, should it be done or not? (I realize that I may be challenging some established habits with these changes.) Also, what are the rules for enum and function-pointer typedefs? CodingStyle does not discuss these cases. Complete patch is 376K and follows as a link. This violates point 6 of SubmittingPatches (no links), but is justified by point 7 (e-mail size). http://peltkore.net/~vegard/linux-2.6-ide-typedef-vegard.patch Regards from Vegard's - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists