lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610161221300.6908@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>
cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Will Schmidt wrote:

> Node 1 MemTotal:       327680 kB
> Node 1 MemFree:        435704 kB

Too big.

> Node 1 MemUsed:      18446744073709443592 kB

Memused is going negative?

> Node 1 Active:          41412 kB
> Node 1 Inactive:        19976 kB
> Node 1 HighTotal:           0 kB
> Node 1 HighFree:            0 kB
> Node 1 LowTotal:       327680 kB
> Node 1 LowFree:        435704 kB
> Node 1 Dirty:               0 kB
> Node 1 Writeback:           0 kB
> Node 1 Mapped:              0 kB
> Node 1 Slab:                0 kB

zero slab??? That cannot be. The slab allocator always allocs on each 
node. Or is this <2.6.18 with the strange counters that we had before?


> Node 0 MemTotal:       229376 kB
> Node 0 MemFree:             0 kB
> Node 0 MemUsed:        229376 kB

Node 0 is filled up during bootup?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ