[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <B72905BB-6E8D-47FD-9A20-269B27136DB2@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:39:16 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: mfbaustx <mfbaustx@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: copy_from_user / copy_to_user with no swap space
On Oct 16, 2006, at 15:19:03, mfbaustx wrote:
> So you're absolutely obligated to DO the copy at the time the
> kernel is executing on behalf of that process. Once your process/
> thread is context swapped, you've lost the [correct] information on
> the address mapping.
Yes, this is correct.
> So, IF you MUST copy_from/to_user when in the context of the
> process, AND IF you have no virtual memory/swapping, THEN must it
> not be true that you can ALWAYS dereferences your user space pointers?
I'm not sure I entirely understand what you're asking here; perhaps
you could rephrase or explain what you're trying to do? From what I
can pick up from your description; you may be missing that program
text pages and memory-mapped files may be "swapped-out" even
*without* a swap device. As an example, when I first start /bin/bash
(ignoring readahead for the moment), very little of the binary and
shared libraries are actually in memory (the rest is left on disk).
When I use data or call a function that hasn't been loaded from disk
yet, a major fault occurs, the kernel loads data from the bash
executable file or a shared library, and then maps it into the
process address space.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists