linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc2] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: 64-bit DMAcapability fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1161032399.3433.28.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:59:59 -0500
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	"Ju, Seokmann" <Seokmann.Ju@....com>
Cc:	Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
	Andrey Mirkin <amirkin@...ru>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc2] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: 64-bit
	DMAcapability fix

On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:37 -0600, Ju, Seokmann wrote:
> Hi,
> > Er ... this patch would apply in reverse, but what's in the tree
> > currently looks to be correct.
> No, the patch submitted by Andrey and Vasily should fix the issue.
> Without this, driver still claims 64-bit DMA capability for those MegaRAID SATA controllers.

Actually ... I found the problem ... the patch is double attached in the
email so applying it spits reverse patch applied errors.  I've corrected
this and put it in the tree.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/