[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F40F49D8-C870-420C-B6C6-FB14CADBDDA2@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:09:29 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aeb@....nl, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Why aren't partitions limited to fit within the device?
On Oct 15, 2006, at 20:08:50, Neil Brown wrote:
> Hmmm.. So Alan things a partially-outside-this-disk partition
> shouldn't show up at all, and Andries thinks it should.
> And both give reasonably believable justifications.
>
> Maybe we need a kernel parameter? How about this?
>
> [...snip...]
> So provide a kernel-parameter which a 'safe' default.
>
> partitions=strict
> is the default
> partitions=relaxed
> means that partitions are clipped rather than rejected.
> This kernel parameters only applies to auto-detected partitions,
> not those set by ioctl.
Perhaps it should also support partitions=none; so that those of us
who want to use a small userspace program and device-mapper to do the
partition discovery and access may do so without worrying about how
the kernel perceives the partitions (if at all). It also makes it
fairly trivial to add support for entirely new parition types without
having to modify the kernel at all.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists