linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] ACPI: handle timer ticks proactively

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610160100.00954.len.brown@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:59:59 -0400
From:	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
To:	Adam Belay <abelay@...ell.com>
Cc:	ACPI-ML <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] ACPI: handle timer ticks proactively

I ran bltk this patch vs 2.6.18.1 on a Dell i6400 Core Duo laptop.
Initial result (1 measurement of each kernel) is that
battery life is unchanged, but response time improves with the new patch.

Summary files attached.

thanks,
-Len

View attachment "Report.2.6.8.1-amb2" of type "text/plain" (4020 bytes)

View attachment "Report.2.6.8.1" of type "text/plain" (4014 bytes)