[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160983735.32674.4.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-03>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:28:55 +0200
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aeb@....nl, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Why aren't partitions limited to fit within the device?
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 10:08 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday October 13, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
> > Ar Gwe, 2006-10-13 am 09:50 +1000, ysgrifennodd Neil Brown:
> > > So: Is there any good reason to not clip the partitions to fit
> > > within the device - and discard those that are completely beyond
> > > the end of the device??
> >
> > Its close but not quite the right approach
> >
> > > The patch at the end of the mail does that. Is it OK to submit this
> > > to mainline?
> >
> > No I think not. Any partition which is partly outside the disk should be
> > ignored entirely, that ensures it doesn't accidentally get mounted and
> > trashed by an HPA or similar mixup.
>
> Hmmm.. So Alan things a partially-outside-this-disk partition
> shouldn't show up at all, and Andries thinks it should.
> And both give reasonably believable justifications.
Maybe the whole part table should be marked as "weird" to let userspace
run a diagnostics/repair tool on the disk.
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists