[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4535032F.2080807@rtr.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:22:07 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Allen Martin <AMartin@...dia.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, prakash@...noor.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Robert Hancock wrote:
>>>
>>> +/* ADMA Physical Region Descriptor - one SG segment */
>>> +struct nv_adma_prd {
>>> + __le64 addr;
>>> + __le32 len;
>>> + u8 flags;
>>> + u8 packet_len;
..
>>> +struct nv_adma_cpb {
>>> + u8 resp_flags; //0
>>> + u8 reserved1; //1
>>> + u8 ctl_flags; //2
>>> + // len is length of taskfile in 64 bit words
>>> + u8 len; //3 + u8
>>> tag; //4
>>> + u8 next_cpb_idx; //5
>..
>> Are those CPB / PRD structs endian-safe when using a big-endian CPU?
>>
>> Cheers
>
> They should be, I believe cpu_to_leXX is used whenever the multi-byte
> elements are being written.
I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields,
such as the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently
depending upon endianess.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists