[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <45344382.900@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:44:18 -0400
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>
To: Dan Dennedy <dan@...nedy.org>
Cc: linux1394-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
For users of Fedora Core releases
<fedora-list@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raw1394 problems galore
Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 2:38 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> kino-0.8 receives video from it in real time and is doing so right now,
>>> and can capture it to file, and then play/edit that file, or could
>>> saturday when I last tried it. I ASSume that kino-0.9.2 could also
>>> play/edit that file, but have not verified that by reinstalling 0.9.2.
>> ...
>>> I was told it was a total rewrite of bad code when I complained about a
>>> year ago. My reply at the time was that it worked, and I don't often
>>> fix things that are working. I'm getting lazy in my dotage I guess.
>> I don't remember what was changed at that time. Maybe that was the
>> addition of the new isochronous interface that I mentioned. The old one
>> was (is?) still there but maybe there were interactions...
>
> Allow me to help clarify. There are 4 interfaces for capturing DV--I kid you
> not! One is video1394, which Kino has never supported for capture. Kino 0.8.0
> supports legacy raw1394 and dv1394 switchable via Preferences. Gene is using
> the legacy raw1394 in that version, based upon a screenshot he sent. Kino
> 0.9.2 supports dv1394 and libiec61883 (atop raw1394 rawiso) switchable ONLY
> at build time requiring an explicit configure option for dv1394. This is to
> coerce builders to the newest and best capture interface.
>
>> However this is not related to the inability to issue AV/C commands, which
>> are issued asynchronously.
>
> Correct; it is very curious that his device is not recognized via configROM
> probes and does not respond to AV/C control commands. This now impacts Kino
> 0.9.2 with libiec61883 (Gene's configuration) because I simplified the UI for
> the typical case--the one where 1394 asynch works. In that case, the first
> recognized camera during a bus traversal (or selectable via a simple pulldown
> menu) lets Kino determine on which 1394 port this device sits in order to
> make capture "just work." (permissions issues to /dev/raw1394 aside :-) It is
> very rare that someone can capture but not have AV/C and device recognition.
> The majority of problem reports are just the opposite with the majority
> resolved by unloading eth1394!
>
After a fresh install of kernel-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 and friends tonight,
it all, for kino-0.9.2, Just Works(TM) with one minor exception. The
sound I hear while not capturing is intermittently all tore up, very
choppy. This effect seems to come and go at random intervals, but I
didn't notice it when playing back the capture later.
All previous kernels were 2.6.17-1 with whatever the redhat folks
patched in for their usage.
FWIW, even dvcont works now. So ATM, and until I get that wedding tape
into my hands (its at home, while I'm sitting in a motel waiting on a
freight shipment that SHOULD have been here Sept 28th, am a happy camper
but twiddling my arthritic thumbs to the point of needing pain meds.
In other words, YIPPEE!
--
Cheers everybody, Gene
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists