linux-kernel - Re: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610172146450.928@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:47:48 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG_BLOCK

>> Never mind, I see that some filesystems have 'depends on BLOCK' instead 
>> of being wrapped into if BLOCK. Not really consistent but whatever.
>
>Feel free to send in patches that make things more consistent.

How would you like things? if BLOCK or depends on BLOCK?
Does menuconfig/oldconfig/etc. parse the whole config structure faster 
it it done either way?

	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/