linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45354320.6030009@rtr.ca>
Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Allen Martin <AMartin@...dia.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, prakash@...noor.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4

Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Mark> I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields, such as
>     Mark> the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently
>     Mark> depending upon endianess.
> 
> I don't know of any gcc version that changes the order of struct
> fields.  You might be thinking of bitfields, which are laid out in an
> endian-dependent way.

Ack.  And also thinking about other compilers I work with,
which apparently are not so friendly.

You are correct -- I just verified it (again) for myself on x86 & PPC,
and the layout of u8 doesn't change.

Cheers!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/