linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:04:24 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Allen Martin <AMartin@...dia.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, prakash@...noor.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..

Robert Hancock wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Robert Hancock wrote:
..
>> Be careful of that.  The original PDC hardware for ADMA still had
>> the "don't cross a 64KB boundary" requirement.
..
> That is part of the ADMA spec - but in that case, how come the 
> pdc_adma.c driver sets the dma_boundary in the SCSI host template to 
> 4GB? That seems wrong.

Ah, you are correct.  My memory is fading of such things.
The PDC parts are good for 2^34 transfer sizes (bytes).

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/