linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] fsstack: Introduce fsstack_copy_{attr,inode}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:40:31 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Josef Jeff Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
cc:	Andrew James Wade <andrew.j.wade@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, hch@...radead.org,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, ezk@...sunysb.edu,
	mhalcrow@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] fsstack: Introduce fsstack_copy_{attr,inode}_*


>To: null@...efsipek.net

(Superb idea to prekill any Cc, re-adding them)

>+void __fsstack_copy_attr_all(struct inode *dest,
>+			     const struct inode *src,
>+			     int (*get_nlinks)(struct inode *))
>+{
>[big]
>+}
>+
>+/* externs for fs/stack.c */
>+extern void __fsstack_copy_attr_all(struct inode *dest,
>+				    const struct inode *src,
>+				    int (*get_nlinks)(struct inode *));
>+
>+static inline void fsstack_copy_attr_all(struct inode *dest,
>+					 const struct inode *src)
>+{
>+	__fsstack_copy_attr_all(dest, src, NULL);
>+}

Do we really need this indirection? Can't __fsstack_copy_attr_all be 
named fsstack_copy_attr_all instead?


	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/