| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200610192329.07361.elinar@ihug.co.nz> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:29:07 +1300 From: Glenn Enright <elinar@...g.co.nz> To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions? On Thursday 19 October 2006 23:09, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I'm sorry if I implied... It is not a problem of limited resources. > If I can choose I allways tend to install only necessary software. I suppose that certainly helps when chasing bugs. Did you have an alternative way of building the docs in mind that could be lighter? I admit the tree you described does seem a large pull just so you can read some text for one source package... even if it is the kernel. > Thanks for your 2c (they are rarity here!), You're welcome -- Please don't CC messages to me from mailing lists. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists