[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161275715.17335.92.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Cal Peake <cp@...olutedigital.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
Ar Iau, 2006-10-19 am 09:09 -0600, ysgrifennodd Eric W. Biederman:
> > Not the core basic ones that are those people care about
>
> I agree. It just appears that the core basic ones that people
> care about is the empty set.
You should read linux-kernel or the other lists and look at the
complaints the deprecation caused, its not an empty set. It isn't a
large set apparently either however.
> > ** the sysctl() binary interface. However this interface
> > ** is unstable and deprecated and will be removed in the future.
> > ** For a stable interface use /proc/sys.
This is a bit self-referential and self-inflicted. I wish to deprecate
it wrongly because there is a comment that it is deprecated wrongly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists