lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:57:19 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc2-mm1 > > What is the reason for not using an apic/lapic NMI source for the watchdog? That is nmi_watchdog=2. But then the watchdog would run at full HZ frequency and use a lot of CPU time unnecessarily -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/