[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4537BF8A.9040004@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:10:18 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Carsten Otte <cotte@...enet.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc2-mm1
Carsten Otte wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> The page we're writing into isn't locked, so there's no deadlock afaict.
>>
>> But then, I forget how xip works. Carsten, is it actually being used for
>> anything?
>>
>
> The comment may be superfluous. I did not quite understand the deadlock
> condition refered to by the comment in filemap, therefore I cut&pasted
> it over. I will send a patch that removes it.
Yes, it wasn't a good comment. Basically we can't hold the page lock and
then enter the page fault handler. mm-fix-pagecache-write-deadlocks.patch
has quite a lot of comments to explain it.
I don't believe filemap_xip holds the page lock, so you don't need to do
the atomic copy, and you don't need to do the fault_in_pages_readable.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists