[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161282454.6961.126.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:27:34 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 06:44 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:26 -0700, akpm@...l.org wrote:
>
> > diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
> > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups
> > +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_pi
> >
> > static int __init init_pit_clocksource(void)
> > {
> > - if (num_possible_cpus() > 4) /* PIT does not scale! */
> > + if (num_possible_cpus() > 1) /* PIT does not scale! */
> > return 0;
> >
>
> Can we ifdef some code here on CONFIG_SMP . It bugs me that there just
> dead code laying around on smp systems.
I still want the pit to be available on SMP kernels that boot on UP
systems, so I don't think an ifdef will do it. Maybe it would be
possible to do some smp alternatives-like code removal on SMP systems?
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists