linux-kernel - pci_[g|s]et_drvdata() versus ->driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:32:44 -0700
From:	David KOENIG <karhudever@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: pci_[g|s]et_drvdata() versus ->driver_data

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is there any reason for some drivers that I should leave references as
foo->driver_data instead of pci_get_drvdata(foo)?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFN8TLmhCgVPlWJY8RAv4lAJ9VrJg+DlXt+AMvVBBbMSgl/3UqzgCgpynk
cGm7n7hfEdgWZQxZ0qeXhqE=
=0KXz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/