linux-kernel - Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610191429010.10316@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>
cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Will Schmidt wrote:

> Is there a hook where we can see what/where the memory is going?  Does
> it seem reasonable for all of the memory that is in node 0 to be
> consumed? 
> Mine appears to have... 
> Node 0 MemTotal:       229376 kB
> Node 0 MemFree:             0 kB
> Node 0 MemUsed:        229376 kB

The memory is likely consumed before the slab allocator bootstrap code is 
reached.

> And one of Paul's earlier notes mentioned about a gig of ram on node0;

Yeah. I cannot make sense out of all of this. What is so special about 
node 0?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/