linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:30:37 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, dino@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com,
	Simon.Derr@...l.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

Suresh, responding to pj:
> > It was to show that even the existing cpu_exclusive
> > flag lets one create sched domains configurations that might not be
> > what one wanted.
> 
> I agree with your point. Lets take this out of discussion for now.

Excellent.

Rather than taking this point out of discussion, lets extend this
agreement, to remove the existing cpu_exclusive flag's side affect of
creating sched domain configurations.

Patches coming shortly.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/