linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061019011831.549d00c6.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:18:31 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	dino@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com, Simon.Derr@...l.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mbligh@...gle.com,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

pj, responding to Nick:
> > But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.
> 
> Agreed - that's why I am about to send a patch that removes
> the sched domain side affects of the cpu_exclusive flag.

And Andrew has already pulled this "explicit dynamid sched
domain control flag" patch, at my request.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/