[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061019090311.GA17882@pelagius.h-e-r-e-s-y.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:03:11 +0000
From: andrew@...rond.org
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make headers_install headers problem on sparc64
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:50:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Hm, yes. There's still a lot of crap being exposed there that we really
> don't need to be showing. Try this entirely untested patch...
>
> The sparc64 version could do with something similar, too.
>
I'm on sparc64 (pure 64bit) so I can't test your patch. For reference,
I used this (not as smart as yours) patch:
diff -Naur linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h
--- linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h 2006-09-20 03:42:06.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h 2006-10-19 08:57:11.000000000 +0000
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE 0x0000010000000000UL
#endif
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
/* This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
instruction set this cpu supports. */
@@ -163,6 +164,8 @@
#define ELF_HWCAP sparc64_elf_hwcap();
+#endif
+
/* This yields a string that ld.so will use to load implementation
specific libraries for optimization. This is more specific in
intent than poking at uname or /proc/cpuinfo. */
Andrew Walrond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists